Zachary Howard Zachary Howard's Profile Page

Zachary Howard Zachary Howard

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

100％合格率のCCAK認定内容試験-試験の準備方法-正確的なCCAKテスト内容

CCAK学習ツールの魂としての「信頼できる信用」、経営理念としての「最大限のサービス意識」により、高品質のサービスをお客様に提供するよう努めています。 CCAK認定テストに関する小さな質問に答えてくれるカスタマーサービススタッフは、CCAK試験の質問にカスタマー指向サービスのサービス原則を完全に実装します。 CCAKテストトレントに関するパズルは、タイムリーで効果的な応答を受け取ります。公式ウェブサイトにメッセージを残すか、CCAK学習ガイドの電子メールを送信してください。

CCAK試験は、クラウドサービス、クラウドコンピューティング、サイバーセキュリティ技術に関する知識を持つように設計された、グローバルに認められた認定試験です。この試験は、クラウドインフラストラクチャとアプリケーションを監査し、その分野で専門知識を開発し、クラウドセキュリティ監査を実行するプロフェッショナルを支援するために作成されました。

>> CCAK認定内容 <<

CCAKテスト内容、CCAK絶対合格

最新のISACA CCAKスタディガイドが作成されていることをご注意ください。これらの試験教材は高い合格率です。 CCAK学習ガイドは、今後の試験に最適な支援になると確信しています。「ノーパス全額返金」を保証します。過去の失敗について落ち込んでいて、有効なCCAK学習ガイドを探したいと思う場合は、間違いなく100％合格として試験資料に返信することをお勧めします。私たちのCCAK学習ガイドに対する何千もの候補者の選択があなたの賢明な決定です。

ISACA CCAK（クラウド監査知識証明書）認定試験は、クラウド監査のプロフェッショナルの知識とスキルを認定するグローバルに認められた資格です。この試験は、クラウドコンピューティングと監査、コンプライアンス、ガバナンスに与える影響についての理解力をテストするように設計されています。CCAK認定は、クラウドコンピューティングに関連するリスクを評価・管理し、ステークホルダーに保証を提供する能力を示すものです。

ISACA Certificate of Cloud Auditing Knowledge 認定 CCAK 試験問題 (Q161-Q166):

質問 # 161
Application programming interfaces (APIs) are likely to be attacked continuously by bad actors because they:

A. could be poorly designed.
B. are generally the most exposed part.
C. act as a very effective backdoor.
D. are the asset with private IP addresses.

正解：B

解説：
APIs are likely to be attacked continuously by bad actors because they are generally the most exposed part of an application or system. APIs serve as the interface between different components or services, and often expose sensitive data or functionality to the outside world. APIs can be accessed by anyone with an Internet connection, and can be easily discovered by scanning or crawling techniques. Therefore, APIs are a prime target for attackers who want to exploit vulnerabilities, steal data, or disrupt services.
References:
* ISACA, Certificate of Cloud Auditing Knowledge (CCAK) Study Guide, 2021, p. 88-89.
* OWASP, The Ten Most Critical API Security Risks - OWASP Foundation, 2019, p. 4-5

質問 # 162
Which of the following is the reason for designing the Consensus Assessments Initiative Questionnaire (CAIQ)?

A. Cloud users can use CAIQ to sign statement of work (SOW) with cloud access security brokers (CASBs).
B. Cloud service providers can document roles and responsibilities for cloud security.
C. Cloud service providers need the CAIQ to improve quality of customer service
D. Cloud service providers can document their security and compliance controls.

正解：D

解説：
Explanation
The reason for designing the Consensus Assessments Initiative Questionnaire (CAIQ) is to help cloud service providers document their security and compliance controls. The CAIQ is a survey provided by the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) that consists of a set of yes/no questions that correspond to the controls of the Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM), which is a cybersecurity framework for cloud computing. The CAIQ allows cloud service providers to demonstrate their security posture and compliance status to potential customers and auditors, as well as to identify any gaps or risks that need to be addressed. The CAIQ also enables cloud customers to assess the security capabilities of different cloud service providers and compare them based on their needs and requirements123.
The other options are not directly related to the question. Option A, cloud users can use CAIQ to sign statement of work (SOW) with cloud access security brokers (CASBs), is incorrect because CAIQ is not a contract or an agreement, but a questionnaire that provides information about the security controls of a cloud service provider. A statement of work (SOW) is a document that defines the scope, deliverables, and terms of a project or service. A cloud access security broker (CASB) is a software tool or service that acts as an intermediary between cloud users and cloud service providers, providing visibility, data security, threat protection, and compliance4. Option B, cloud service providers can document roles and responsibilities for cloud security, is incorrect because CAIQ is not designed to document roles and responsibilities, but security and compliance controls. Roles and responsibilities for cloud security are defined by the shared responsibility model, which outlines how the security tasks and obligations are divided between the cloud service provider and the cloud customer5. Option D, cloud service providers need the CAIQ to improve quality of customer service, is incorrect because CAIQ is not a measure of customer service quality, but a measure of security control transparency. Customer service quality refers to how well a cloud service provider meets or exceeds the expectations and satisfaction of its customers6. References := What is CASB? - Cloud Security Alliance4 What is CAIQ? | CSA - Cloud Security Alliance1 Shared Responsibility Model - Cloud Security Alliance5 What is CAIQ? - Panorays2 What is the Consensus Assessments Initiative Questionnaire (CAIQ ...3 What Is Customer Service Quality? - Salesforce.com

質問 # 163
After finding a vulnerability in an Internet-facing server of an organization, a cybersecurity criminal is able to access an encrypted file system and successfully manages to overwrite parts of some files with random data. In reference to the Top Threats Analysis methodology, how would the technical impact of this incident be categorized?

A. As a control breach
B. As an integrity breach
C. As a confidentiality breach
D. As an availability breach

正解：B

解説：
Explanation
The technical impact of this incident would be categorized as an integrity breach in reference to the Top Threats Analysis methodology. The Top Threats Analysis methodology is a process developed by the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) to help organizations identify, analyze, and mitigate the top threats to cloud computing, as defined in the CSA Top Threats reports. The methodology consists of six steps: scope definition, threat identification, technical impact identification, business impact identification, risk assessment, and risk treatment. Each of these provides different insights and visibility into the organization's security posture.1 The technical impact identification step involves determining the impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the information system caused by each threat. Confidentiality refers to the protection of data from unauthorized access or disclosure. Integrity refers to the protection of data from unauthorized modification or deletion. Availability refers to the protection of data and services from disruption or denial.2 An integrity breach occurs when a threat compromises the accuracy and consistency of the data or system. An integrity breach can result in data corruption, falsification, or manipulation, which can affect the reliability and trustworthiness of the data or system. An integrity breach can also have serious consequences for the business operations and decisions that depend on the data or system.3 In this case, the cybersecurity criminal was able to access an encrypted file system and overwrite parts of some files with random data. This means that the data in those files was altered without authorization and became unusable or invalid. This is a clear example of an integrity breach, as it violated the principle of ensuring that data is accurate and consistent throughout its lifecycle.4 References := CCAK Study Guide, Chapter 4: A Threat Analysis Methodology for Cloud Using CCM, page
811; What is CIA Triad? Definition and Examples2; Data Integrity vs Data Security: What's The Difference?3; Data Integrity: Definition & Examples

質問 # 164
Which of the following metrics are frequently immature?

A. Metrics around Infrastructure as a Service (laaS) computing environments
B. Metrics around specific Software as a Service (SaaS) application services
C. Metrics around Infrastructure as a Service (laaS) storage and network environments
D. Metrics around Platform as a Service (PaaS) development environments

正解：D

解説：
Metrics around Platform as a Service (PaaS) development environments are frequently immature, as PaaS is a relatively new and evolving cloud service model that offers various tools and platforms for developing, testing, deploying, and managing cloud applications. PaaS metrics are often not well-defined, standardized, or consistent across different providers and platforms, and may not capture the full value and performance of PaaS services. PaaS metrics may also be difficult to measure, monitor, and compare, as they depend on various factors, such as the type, complexity, and quality of the applications, the level of customization and integration, the usage patterns and demand, and the security and compliance requirements. Therefore, PaaS metrics may not provide sufficient insight or assurance to cloud customers and auditors on the effectiveness, efficiency, reliability, and security of PaaS services12.
Reference:
Cloud Computing Service Metrics Description - NIST
Cloud KPIs You Need to Measure Success - VMware Blogs

質問 # 165
A cloud auditor observed that just before a new software went live, the librarian transferred production data to the test environment to confirm the new software can work in the production environment. What additional control should the cloud auditor check?

A. Training for the librarian
B. Approval of the change by the change advisory board
C. Verification that the hardware of the test and production environments are compatible
D. Explicit documented approval from all customers whose data is affected

正解：D

解説：
The cloud auditor should check if there is explicit documented approval from all customers whose data is affected by the transfer of production data to the test environment. This is because production data may contain sensitive or personal information that is subject to privacy and security regulations, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) or the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Therefore, using production data for testing purposes without the consent of the data owners may violate their rights and expose the organization to legal and reputational risks. This is also stated in the Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) control DSI-04: Production / Non-Production Environments12, which is part of the Data Security & Information Lifecycle Management domain. The CCM is a cybersecurity control framework for cloud computing that can be used by cloud customers to build an operational cloud risk management program.
The other options are not directly related to the question. Option A, approval of the change by the change advisory board, refers to the process of reviewing and authorizing changes to the system or software before they are implemented in the production environment. This is a good practice for ensuring the quality and reliability of the system or software, but it does not address the issue of using production data for testing purposes. Option C, training for the librarian, refers to the process of providing adequate education and awareness to the staff who are responsible for managing and transferring data between different environments.
This is a good practice for ensuring the competence and accountability of the staff, but it does not address the issue of obtaining consent from the data owners. Option D, verification that the hardware of the test and production environments are compatible, refers to the process of ensuring that the system or software can run smoothly and consistently on both environments. This is a good practice for ensuring the performance and functionality of the system or software, but it does not address the issue of protecting the privacy and security of the production data. References :=
* Certificate of Cloud Auditing Knowledge (CCAK) Study Guide, Chapter 6: Cloud Security Controls
* Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) - CSA3
* DSI-04: Production / Non-Production Environments - CSF Tools - Identity Digital1
* DSI: Data Security & Information Lifecycle Management - CSF Tools - Identity Digital

質問 # 166
......

CCAKテスト内容: https://www.jptestking.com/CCAK-exam.html